The Nasdaq backs a ban on "Flash" trading (Reuters), even though they make a lot of money providing flash orders. it sounds to me like the Nasdaq knows the game is up and is trying to put their best face on it.
Nasdaq and rival BATS Exchange started on June 3 "flashing" buy and sell orders to exchange members, including big banks and hedge funds -- closely mirroring a service offered by alternative venue Direct Edge, which long offered the service to a smaller group of market participants, and was growing its market share at the exchanges' expense.
So who the hell is Direct Edge? It turns out there is
another article on Reuters:
Direct Edge was the first to start "flashing" customer orders -- for fractions of a second -- to certain market members before routing them elsewhere to all participants.
The practice gives banks, hedge funds, and some dark pools, where orders are matched anonymously, an advanced look at order flow. The service helped spark Direct Edge's impressive growth, and was closely imitated early last month by formal exchanges Nasdaq Stock Market and BATS Exchange.
Direct Edge, which now has about 12 percent of U.S. equity market share, is center stage in defending flashes as an optional service that provides liquidity to those who otherwise wouldn't have it, and as a natural evolution of competition among exchanges for trading volumes.
So, it seems that this Direct Edge found a way to game the system, make a lot of money doing it, and the other exchanges "had to" go along to keep up. But, still, who is Direct Edge?
Direct Edge is owned by Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan Chase & Co, hedge fund Citadel, Knight Capital Group, and the International Securities Exchange, a unit of Deutsche Boerse's Eurex exchange.
Why does that not surprise me?
By the way, the fact that the NYSE does not do flash orders does not make them pure as the driven snow. I'll have more on that on another day.